Choose fontsize:
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Northrop F-5 Tiger II  (Read 20465 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Anna M. Wood
AzAP Contributor - 1000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1127



View Profile WWW
« Reply #75 on: March 09, 2014, 08:17:21 PM »

Logged

Anna M. Wood
http://www.AnnaMWood.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/solidmuse
All images Anna M. Wood, all rights reserved.
Tower Guy
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2338



View Profile Email
« Reply #76 on: March 09, 2014, 08:50:03 PM »

Very nice shot Anna, I like the angle you shot it from, great light also.
Logged
Anna M. Wood
AzAP Contributor - 1000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1127



View Profile WWW
« Reply #77 on: March 09, 2014, 08:53:19 PM »

Thank you Harvey....   Smiley
Logged

Anna M. Wood
http://www.AnnaMWood.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/solidmuse
All images Anna M. Wood, all rights reserved.
Jeff D. Welker
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3319



View Profile WWW
« Reply #78 on: March 09, 2014, 10:45:59 PM »

Very nice shot Anna, I like the angle you shot it from, great light also.

I concur Anna - well done.
Logged

Jeff D. Welker
www.jeffdwelker.com
Mesa, AZ

Please do not Tag, Share or otherwise Re-Distribute
any posted images without consent.
Anna M. Wood
AzAP Contributor - 1000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1127



View Profile WWW
« Reply #79 on: March 10, 2014, 12:07:02 AM »

Thanks Jeff....

Here they are under the lights.



« Last Edit: March 10, 2014, 12:23:55 AM by RenderBay » Logged

Anna M. Wood
http://www.AnnaMWood.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/solidmuse
All images Anna M. Wood, all rights reserved.
yipDog
AzAP Contributor
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 205



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #80 on: March 12, 2014, 09:11:09 PM »

Hard to believe this airframe was developed 58 years ago! Still one of the best looking planes out there!
Mesa Gateway Open House 2014



Logged
trmphoto
AzAP Contributor - 500 Posts
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 796



View Profile WWW
« Reply #81 on: April 05, 2014, 11:24:13 PM »


Logged

Tower Guy
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2338



View Profile Email
« Reply #82 on: April 06, 2014, 12:16:51 AM »

Very nice shot Tom, this has always been one of my favorite camo schemes.
Logged
Jeff D. Welker
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3319



View Profile WWW
« Reply #83 on: October 29, 2014, 01:31:35 PM »

Both Anna and Jay have encouraged me to try the 2.35:1 crop ratio. Gave it another try on this image. Not sure if it works? Thoughts?

CINEMASCOPE SNIPER
Logged

Jeff D. Welker
www.jeffdwelker.com
Mesa, AZ

Please do not Tag, Share or otherwise Re-Distribute
any posted images without consent.
Dave S.
AzAP Co-Founder
AzAP Contributor - 1000 Posts
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1149



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #84 on: October 29, 2014, 02:51:36 PM »

Both Anna and Jay have encouraged me to try the 2.35:1 crop ratio. Gave it another try on this image. Not sure if it works? Thoughts?
Jeffe,

My $0.02: The ratio seems to work, but the top & bottom seem a little tight on this image for my taste.  Not trying to re-hash the leading/room to move theory, just my personal taste.

Killer shot, by the way.
Logged

Constructive Comments & Critiques are always welcomed
All images David Shields, all rights reserved
Member: AzAP, APSoCal and Fence Check
www.roxphotography.com

Some Canon bodies and lenses
Scott Youmans
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2484


www.scyphoto.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #85 on: October 29, 2014, 06:22:35 PM »

I like the image's tonality and most everything about it quite a lot.  A question for Anna and Jay.  Why 2.35:1 exactly?  Why not just crop to suit the subject?  I agree with Dave on the height.  I don't think I'd have left much more room but maybe a little more at the top.  We're talking minor tweaks here.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2014, 08:31:53 PM by Scott Youmans » Logged

Scott C. Youmans
www.scyphoto.com
All Rights Reserved
John B.
AzAP Contributor - 500 Posts
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 715



View Profile Email
« Reply #86 on: October 29, 2014, 07:48:19 PM »

Wonderful shot, Jeff!  It feels a little cramped, but the subject is so compelling that it can be overlooked.
Logged
Anna M. Wood
AzAP Contributor - 1000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1127



View Profile WWW
« Reply #87 on: October 29, 2014, 08:37:56 PM »

Scott,

The 2.35:1 is a CinemaScope aspect ratio from the big screen.  (I suspect you knew that already)....

For Jeff....  Jay and I where encouraging trying that type of aspect ratio over maybe a more traditional 16:9 type wide screen crop (1920 x 1080) on a shot Jeff was working with a few weeks ago.  Less dead space above and below the subject.  Can work for many images.  The crux of the conversation was to really stretch the image in X and keep it shorter in Y when an image would work with that type of crop.  Not so much hitting a particular aspect ratio standard, such that are out there for anamorphic cinema type shooting.

« Last Edit: October 29, 2014, 08:43:07 PM by Anna Wood » Logged

Anna M. Wood
http://www.AnnaMWood.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/solidmuse
All images Anna M. Wood, all rights reserved.
Jeff D. Welker
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3319



View Profile WWW
« Reply #88 on: October 29, 2014, 09:00:13 PM »

Thanks Dave, Scott, John and Anna for the kind words and interesting comments. I always felt the 16:9 was a wide pano-type crop. The 2.35:1 makes the 16:9 look square. I think it only works on certain images and needs special attention on the top/bottom margins. Not sure if this image suits the crop, but I wanted to try. Thanks again.
Logged

Jeff D. Welker
www.jeffdwelker.com
Mesa, AZ

Please do not Tag, Share or otherwise Re-Distribute
any posted images without consent.
Scott Youmans
AzAP Contributor - 2000 Posts
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2484


www.scyphoto.com


View Profile WWW
« Reply #89 on: October 29, 2014, 09:00:26 PM »

Anna, agreed, a useful direction to go in many instances.  I tend to resist anything that resembles a formula!  I understand you were simply suggesting a wider format in general.  Good call!
Logged

Scott C. Youmans
www.scyphoto.com
All Rights Reserved
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
BlueSkies design by Bloc | XHTML | CSS